← Treasure Hunting

Treasure Hunting

Historical Inaccuracies & Oddities — Chapter 13: The Michael Jordan Card Points to the Wrong Page

Key Takeaway

Jordan’s 1987–88 achievement checks out, but the chapter points to page 112 for a card even though page 112 is in Chapter 12.

Documented Evidence: Strong Pattern Clue: Possible Clue
Historical Inaccuracies and Oddities Chapter 13 series cover.
Historical Inaccuracies & Oddities — Chapter 13

Quick Take

Chapter 13 contains a wonderfully clean oddity that does not require outside historical interpretation. The text says the treasure’s Jordan card is pictured on the previous spread, “page 112.” But Chapter 13 itself begins on page 116, and page 112 is still inside the Gold Rush chapter.

Analysis

The sports claim checks out

The chapter’s major statistical claim about Michael Jordan’s 1987–88 season is defensible. NBA records show he led the league in scoring and became the first player to win MVP and Defensive Player of the Year in the same season.

The page reference does not

On p. 118, the book explicitly directs readers to page 112 for the pictured card. The pagination makes that impossible as written. This is therefore a hard internal-reference error rather than a disputed historical interpretation.

And 007 appears again

The chapter also calls Jordan “basketball 007.” That is not an error, but it echoes Michael Scott’s 007 employee-number story from Chapter 1 and is worth logging as a cross-chapter oddity.

Deep Dive

Chapter 13 is valuable because it gives us a control: the impressive basketball fact is accurate, while the mundane page locator is wrong. That inversion is exactly why internal references deserve as much scrutiny as headline history.

Bottom Line

Verified: Jordan’s 1987–88 award/scoring feat. Wrong: page 112 reference. Odd echo: 007.

Sources & References

  • NBA — Jordan’s 1987–88 scoring lead, MVP and Defensive Player of the Year.

Keep investigating

Open Question

If page 112 is not merely a typo, what is on that page that could justify sending a reader backward into Chapter 12?

Community research

Community Contributions

Approved research contributions appear here after review.

No approved community contributions yet.

Contribute to this Research

Share your strongest relevant evidence, correction, interpretation, challenge, connection, context, research lead, question, or editorial suggestion. This is for substantive research contributions rather than general conversation.

Email privacy: Your email address is private. It is not displayed publicly, used for marketing, sold, or shared at any time with anyone outside StaceyToon.com. It is used only for verification, contribution-limit/moderation controls, and necessary contribution-status communication.

0 / 1,000 characters
Community Contribution Guidelines

Keep the contribution relevant, respectful, self-contained, and no more than 1,000 characters including spaces and punctuation. Plain text only. Do not include links, URLs, disguised links, attachments, embeds, HTML, or Markdown. If a source matters, identify it in plain language by publication, title, author, date, or useful search terms. Constructive disagreement is welcome. Do not split one contribution into multiple submissions to evade the limit.

One verified contribution per email address per article is allowed in each rolling 24-hour period. All verified contributions are reviewed, but submission does not guarantee publication or a personal response. Published contributions may be classified and ranked based on research value.

Nothing is published without Stacey's approval.
Worth sharing or saving?