← Treasure Hunting

Treasure Hunting

The Three Mights Cluster

Key Takeaway

Three closely grouped uses of “might” appear as adult Jon works out how and where to hide the Pokémon treasure.

Editorial cover art for The Three Mights Cluster.

Quick Take

Near the beginning of the adult hiding section, Jon repeatedly uses the word might while considering possibilities. The repetition is compact enough to deserve attention: it occurs precisely when the story shifts from owning the treasure to solving the problem of hiding it. [1]

The observation is simple. The harder question is whether the cluster is merely natural uncertainty—or whether Chapter 25 is telling us to notice a group of three.

Analysis

Why three MIGHTs stand out

Chapter 25 contains many numerical and three-part motifs, but this one does not require converting a word into a number. The same conspicuous modal word repeats three times in a short span while Jon is evaluating what he might do. [1]

Three stacked MIGHT labels marking a compact repetition.
A tight three-word cluster is easy to preserve and test.

The location matters as much as the count. This is the transition into the practical hiding problem. Jon is no longer explaining Pokémon history or describing the value of the collection; he is deciding how the treasure will enter the real world.

That makes the cluster useful as a reading marker even if it never becomes a standalone clue. Three repeated expressions of possibility may be functioning like a small flag: pay attention to the decision-making that follows.

Deep Dive

Does “might” mean more than uncertainty?

There are at least two reasonable readings. In ordinary prose, repeated might is exactly what we would expect when a person is brainstorming uncertain options. In a constructed treasure-hunt chapter, however, an unusually tight repetition can also be intentional texture.

Simple diagram showing uncertainty branching into possible choices.
The repetition occurs while Jon is weighing how the treasure might be hidden.

The stronger case would come from corroboration: another nearby three-part structure, a cross-chapter echo, or a later instruction that makes the count of three operational. Until then, the cluster is best treated as a pattern worth preserving rather than a solved instruction.

Bottom Line

What we know: “might” appears three times in a compact portion of the adult hiding narrative. [1]

What it may mean: the cluster may emphasize the chapter’s recurring use of threes or simply mark a moment of uncertainty and choice.

What it does not establish: three MIGHTs alone do not identify a location, route, or extraction method.

Sources & References

[1] Jon Collins-Black, There's Treasure Inside, Chapter 25, “The Pokémon Box.” Primary source for the quoted/repeated wording and narrative placement discussed in this article.

Keep investigating

Open Question

Do the three MIGHTs align with another nearby set of three strongly enough to turn repetition into an instruction?

Community research

Community Contributions

Approved research contributions appear here after review.

No approved community contributions yet.

Contribute to this Research

Share your strongest relevant evidence, correction, interpretation, challenge, connection, context, research lead, question, or editorial suggestion. This is for substantive research contributions rather than general conversation.

Email privacy: Your email address is private. It is not displayed publicly, used for marketing, sold, or shared at any time with anyone outside StaceyToon.com. It is used only for verification, contribution-limit/moderation controls, and necessary contribution-status communication.

0 / 1,000 characters
Community Contribution Guidelines

Keep the contribution relevant, respectful, self-contained, and no more than 1,000 characters including spaces and punctuation. Plain text only. Do not include links, URLs, disguised links, attachments, embeds, HTML, or Markdown. If a source matters, identify it in plain language by publication, title, author, date, or useful search terms. Constructive disagreement is welcome. Do not split one contribution into multiple submissions to evade the limit.

One verified contribution per email address per article is allowed in each rolling 24-hour period. All verified contributions are reviewed, but submission does not guarantee publication or a personal response. Published contributions may be classified and ranked based on research value.

Nothing is published without Stacey's approval.
Worth sharing or saving?